Just want to confirm, the result of this case is the insurer won because the commissioner (not judge) ruled that the use credit score is acceptable for property insurance even though the standard insurance form is defient and misleading?
2017 Fall Q3 also mentioned BC credit case and from the examiner’s report. This case seems very similar to the PIPEDA case, difference: PIPEDA did not reach SCC but BC case did.
Could we also include BC case in the Landmark case wiki page?